Pre-Trial: A Study and Analysis of the Protection of the Rights of Suspects in Creating Legal Certainty
Keywords:
Protection of the suspect's human rights; Pretrial; Legal certainty.Abstract
Pretrial Institutions are regulated in a limitative manner in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in the form of horizontal oversight with a judicial procedural mechanism to examine, prosecute the implementation of coercive measures carried out by investigators in the investigative process with a quick examination procedure. Its development, after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 dated 28 April 2015 has affected the pretrial institutions regulated in Article 77 letter a of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in order to achieve the protection of the basic rights of suspects. optimal. This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of the protection of the rights of suspects after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014. The research method uses normative juridical with empirical juridical approaches, research uses secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the Pre-trial provisions in Article 77 letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code in order to realize upholding the law and protecting human rights as suspects in investigative examinations have not been achieved. The coercive efforts carried out by investigators are felt to have not been able to achieve legal certainty. Limited supervision of coercive measures, compared to the broad authority of investigators to collect sufficient initial evidence, cannot be assessed by the Pre-trial Judge. Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 dated 28 April 2015 has expanded/added pre-trial authority. The expansion of new legal norms of pre-trial authority has changed the authority of pre-trial in Article 77 a of the Criminal Procedure Code. Giving the right to someone to fight for the rights of those who feel aggrieved to examine and try whether: (i) Arrest; (ii) Detention; (iii) Termination of Investigation; or (iv) Termination of Prosecution; (v) Determination of suspects; (vi) search; (vii) Foreclosure. In line with the considerations of the Constitutional Court Judges in every act of coercion, especially the "determination of suspects" there must be a fulfillment of "at least two pieces of evidence" as contained in Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code as the embodiment of the principledue process of law to protect human rights in the criminal justice process optimally.
References
OC Kaligis,Rusdi Nurima,DennyKailimang,1997, Pra peradilan Dalam Kenyataan, Djambatan, Jakarta.
James W. Nickel, 1996, Hak Asasi Manusia; Refleksi Filosofis atas Deklarasi Universal Hak
Asasi Manusia, Terj: Titis Eddy Arini, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Muladi, Barda Nawawi Arief, 2010, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung, PT.Alumni
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, 2017, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, Semarang, PT.Pustka Rizki Putra.
Yahya Harahap, 2007, Penerapan Permasalahan Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Marlina, 2009, Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, PT Rafika Aditama, Bandung.
WA Bonger, 1977, Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Loegman , Loebby, 1987, Pra Peradilan di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Looegman, Loeby, 2002, Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dalam Hukum Acara Pidana (HAP), Datacom, Jakarta.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
Yahya Harahap, 2007, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidik dan Penuntutan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
_________, 2006, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta
A.C.German et.al, 1970, Introduction To Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Springfield Illionis
Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum , Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung
Adji Samekto, 2015, Pergeseran Pemikiran Hukum Dari Era Yunani Menuju Postmodernisme, Konpress, Jakarta
Anak Agung Putu Wiwik Sugiantari, 2015, Perkembangan Hukum Indonesia dalam Menciptakan Unifikasi dan Kodifikasi Hukum.
Andi Hamzah, 2008, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Anggara, et al, 2014, Pra peradilan di Indonesia Teori, Sejarah dan Praktiknya, Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, Jakarta.
Artidjo Alkostar, 2008, Tantangan Hakim dalam Era Globalisasi, Varia Peradilan, Jakarta
Azhari, 1995, Negara Hukum Indonesia, Analisis Yuridis Normatif Tentang Unsur-Unsurnya, UI.Press, Jakarta
B. Arief Sidharta, 2008, Meuwissen Tentang Pengembangan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum, dan Filsafat Hukum. (Alih bahasa Bab XV, XVI, dan XVII buku: Van Apeldoorns, Inleideng tot de studi van het Nederlans recht, edisi 18 tahun 1985), Refika Aditama, Bandung
Bambang Waluyo, 2002, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Barda Nawawi Arief, 1996, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Pertama
Undang-Undang Dasar Negera Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Larangan Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Pra peradilan
Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian NRI Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014
Sri Rahayu Wilujeng, “Hak Asasi Manusia: Tinjauan Dari Aspek Historis Dan Yuridis”, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/5018-ID-hak-asasi-manusia-tinjauan-dari-aspek-historis-dan-yuridis.pdf, (diunduh pada tanggal 21 Desember 2022)
Sudhono Iswahyudi, “Mengkritisi Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol.1 No.2, Sept 2004.
A. Anugrahni, 2017, Memahami Kepastian (Dalam) Hukum, ukum.wordpress.com. diakses pada tanggal 28 Agustus 2022, waktu: 12:50
Bahran, “Penetapan Tersangka Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia”, Syariah: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Pemikiran Penetapan Tersangka Menurut.....220-239 Vol 17, No 2, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/257140-penetapan-tersangka-menurut-hukum-acara-57b14c41.pdf, (di unduh tanggal 8 Desember 2022, pukul 20.00).
Sidik Sunaryo, 2009, “Ambiguitas Isu Hukum dan Keadilan (Sisi Lain Dari Pemilihan Presiden)”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. II, No. 1, Juni, halaman 24.
Yuddin Chandra Nan Arif, “Dimensi Perubahan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Sistem Hukum Terbuka (The Dimension of The Change of Law Viewed From The Erspective of Open Legal System)", Jurnal IUS, Vol. I, No. 1, April 2013, hlm125. Hukum sebagai sistem yang terbuka (dengan pendekatan berbagai multi disiplin ilmu terhadap domain hukum) khususnya konteks kajian ini (perubahan hukum dan perubahan sosial) harus menjadi dasar pengambilan kebijakan dalam rangka penyusunan pembaharuan hukum nasional Indonesia, hlm. 122.
Zulfi Diane Zaini, 2012, “Perspektif Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia (Sebuah Pendekatan Filsafat)”, Jurnal Hukum, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2, Desember 2012, halaman 938.
Bambang Widiyantoro, Evi Rumata Parapat, “Das Sein dan Das Sollen dalam Sistem Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) di Indonesia”, Majalah Ilmiah Solusi Unsika, Vol. 10, No.20, Sept-Nov 2011, hlm.3
Wawancara dengan Hendra Wijaya, Advokat pada Kantor Hukum Kedai Kopi Law Semarang pada hari Selasa, tanggal 8 November 2022
